Saturday, January 29, 2022

Fanfare for the Common Man

Teen Trumpet On The Beach At Sunset Stock Photo - Download Image Now -  iStock


On March 12, 1943, the Cinncinati Symphony Orchestra opened a concert with Aaron Copland's new Fanfare for the Common Man; it was a serendipitous place to celebrate the lives of normal people, those who go from birth to death without gracing the pages of a newspaper or the history books: Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (c. 500 BC), for whom the city in Ohio is named, was a Roman statesman who stood up for the plebeian, or common man, against those (amongst them his own son) who wanted to keep them in a kind of perpetual servitude. Cincinnatus came into almost absolute power as dictator at the request of his fellow Romans: persuaded to leave his plough, he worked to create a more just republic for the mass of Roman citizens, and then gave up his power as soon as he could, returning to the work of the common man, returning to his plough and fields. He is in the Roman history books, such as Livy's History of Rome, as a man representing the best of civic virtue: solid, humble, brave, a servant of the common good and his fellow common man. 

In the city that bears this great (common) man's name, Copland's Fanfare for the Common Man was a response to the part that millions of men and women were playing in the fight against totalitarianism in the guise of fascism: it was a celebration of that peculiar mix of viewpoints one must have to properly appreciate the identity of what others have derisively called "the masses" or "the silent majority."  Thoreau characterized these as "the mass of men [who] live quiet lives of desperation." In one sense, Thoreau was referring to those, in his day, who blindly accepted the status quo and were not looking transcendentally at life: those who did not look beyond the roof and walls of atmosphere around them, conventions and propaganda, to the expanse of order beyond that is the foundation for the air they breathed, to the principles of justice and beauty. Therefore, in one sense, Thoreau may have been right: there are certainly many people who are "common" in the sense that they are complacent, uneducated, uninterested in anything beyond their own comforts. However, Thoreau, with a certain hue of the Harvardian self-important whiner, likely was looking, ironically, too narrowly from his own status in the intellectual class to see whom Copland, decades later, might be referring to. 

Who was Copland celebrating? I've seen many of them in the history books, like Horatio at the Bridge; like Cloelia, a Roman woman who came out of obscurity to fight when it was needed; fishermen at Galilee who dared to follow a nomadic Rabbi; the unknown artists who helped keep Christian civilization alive by creating bibles like the Book of Kells; those obscure faces under helmets in the mud who lived for weeks and months in the pits of hell on the front lines of Europe; pioneers on the Oregon Trail who left directions for others not to repeat their mistakes as they forged across the West; Native Americans who pursued justice as they were forced onto reservations, a justice that was not revenge...the list goes on and on, countless common men, women, and children who actually made history. Made history. Allowed it to continue.

Copland's Fanfare begins with simple brass notes, one and then two instruments. The melody sounds immense, expansive, like two cherubim calling across eternity: a surprisingly majestic theme for nobodies.  The echoes continue, deepening, as they are joined by more instruments, more complex movements. It is a slow coming together of innumerable voices: What are they saying? And to whom? 

I have seen the common man, that elusive figure that stands for many. I saw him one day when I was looking down 1st Avenue from an apartment window; I saw the garbage trucks, the taxis, the ambulances, the little silver commuter cars all edging their way, as a group and as individuals weaving, making small decisions in traffic, to work. I thought of all of them collectively getting up at 5 am each day to put food on the table, to educate their children, trying to commit to the daily tasks of life. I saw the uncommon common man when I was a young woman in San Francisco at a bus stop. He drove up, opened the doors, and smiled at me in the gathering dusk; he chatted with what would have, could have been anonymous, isolated passengers: he enjoyed us, he enjoyed his bus, he brought joy into being in a roaring white box in a maze of roads and apartments. I see the common woman in the faces caught on camera during the Depression, holding her children, looking beyond to their future even as hers closes down around her. Their voices are the call to life, the call of the heart and the backbone of any culture, a long, consistent courage. Sometimes we don't pay attention to the billions of good acts each day, because they aren't interesting to us; they don't raise our itchy curiosity for the different, the sensational. However, seeing the good isn't about interest: it is about beauty. The true common person continues to Choose the Good, the basic goods of family and community life, the essence of political life, and these acts are beautiful. When millions of people choose the good without any fanfare, they are calling to God and are lovingly watched by Him.

Therefore, leaders, political, religious, or intellectual, make a great mistake when they forget the true identity of the common person. He or she grows our food, delivers it, serves it, tends our sick, teaches our children, puts out our fires, creates beauty, helps bring new life into our world, stewards the earth and the millions of small communities on the globe. They are not the "thousand thousand thousand [wheel-tenders]" referred to contemptuously and fearfully by the Controller, the totalitarian-population eugenicist in Huxley's Brave New World. Rather, like the Romans ignored Cincinnatus on his farm until things went wrong, you don't think of or see the common person until things start to go wrong; the common man is often a little late off the block, hesitating to introduce disorder into the delicate balance of community and life: but off the block he and she will come, especially once the lives of their children and their communal life are in danger.

In our day, an old and tired story is being acted out once more: In a culture more focused on celebrity and self-absorption (the common person is also culpable here), elites have, yet again, gone Caesar or Marc Antony and think too highly of themselves, going from over-stuffed capitalists into totalitarianistas, and for some reason, as it has always been, billions of dollars are not enough: they need to live forever on the backs of others, they need greater and more perverse pleasure to continue being happy: satisfaction and security instead of virtue and the consistent, courageous, choosing of the Good as they best understand it. In our day, politicians have allowed themselves to be owned by corporations (echoes of facism) or have been run out of office. A situation like this only requires a catalyst to send it into oppression: enter the Public Crisis, whether that be a health crisis, economic crisis, or a climate crisis. 

For the power-gluttonous, these crises are opportunities, and sometimes they are also tempted to manufacture them or fan them into a greater flame. Surely everyone knows from history that for those with wealth to invest, any situation that forces mass purchasing, on the backs again of the common person, is a gold mine. Therefore, whatever one's opinion on the origins and soundness of these crises, the evidence of "raking in money" on the part of a few is self-evident. And, worst of all, as CS Lewis said, is the tyranny that claims its actions are "for your health" or "for your good" or "for the good of society." As one heroic common person, an Austrian MP, said, "Tyrants use apparently good ends as alibis."

In our day, though, Copland's Fanfare is still playing: listen for it. The trumpets begin with the few courageous who dare to lose everything in order to speak the truth from their ploughs: from hospitals where patients are being killed by medical malfeasance, from schools where children are being abused because they can't breathe well for hours on end, from small rallies on bridges across the world, to bigger rallies, to thousands of trucks honking their way to capitals in true service of their brothers who refuse to be coerced into an experimental gene therapy, to ethics professors standing on the great ethical tradition they teach even when fired, to students writing poems about the oppression they have faced over the last two years. 

It is playing in the crowds growing around the world, crowds listening to heroes and common people from all perspectives, echoing to each other even across the abyss of sound created by a failed, captured media. 

Play it again, Common Man. 


Canadian Trucking Alliance condemns protests by un-vaxxed drivers |  Canada's National Observer: News & Analysis

Saturday, January 15, 2022

Hardening Pharoah's Heart

 I have always wondered why God "hardened Pharoah's heart"; I've always been curious about moments in Scripture which seemed to create contradictory views of God's character, loving versus vindictive, just versus unjust; under this curiosity lay a kind of hyper-vigilance around trust issues, around what it means to really be loved by my Creator...and all the love in the world depends on what the love of God means. Our smaller human loves can be re-categorized as various forms of survival needs, memory of infant satisfaction, or simply material, chemical responses to various stimuli, without the love of God. If the Artist, the One beyond who needs nothing from us does not love us, or is not there, all the movements of our wills are reduced, for there is nothing beyond; our loves are no longer signs to a Higher Object, but are ends in themselves--and as St. Catherine of Siena proclaimed with her life the words Jesus spoke to her, "You, human, are what is not; I, your Lord, am what is." Without Him, our loves are nothing; with Him, they can transcend themselves. 

Yet who is this God who loves? Does He really love each of us? God "hardening" a heart that served a vision of polytheistic dominance of the known world seems just on one hand, but when that hardening served to create more suffering for the innocent and only prolonged the time that the Israelites were caught in Egypt, it seems like the unloving creation of unnecessary suffering, at the least, and petulant one-upmanship at the worst. God doesn't need to do one-upmanship, does He? Yet this is what it appears from the very beginning, as Moses and Aaron confront Pharoah's magicians and respond in kind, but better, in contests like making serpents from staffs. God's serpent eats the others. 

As the plagues multiply, the phrase "and God hardened Pharoah's heart" makes its appearance; why? Rabbi David Fohrman offers the following explanation in one of his parishes: There are two Hebrew phrases used: one meaning "made stubborn" (as in one's own will hardening) and the other meaning "made courageous" (as in being given the power to continue to fight). This latter phrase seems less likely, doesn't it? However, this one is used. Why would God "encourage" Pharaoh, and in what way, especially if Pharaoh's vision, and through him, his people, is that of a polytheistic dominance, a view that excluded the sovereignty of a single, transcendent Creator? 

Could it be that God has a larger agenda than just getting the Israelites out of Egypt, though that was the catalyst, the core? What if the whole thing were about justice on a number of levels: justice for His people, the Israelites, a re-ordering justice that set things right for them; justice, in terms of re-ordering the vision of Pharaoh and his people, and through them other peoples throughout geography and time, as the story spread? What if it were about a parental love that did not want to take free will away, ie hardening a heart to make a tool of Pharaoh, but rather to say, "Son, fight me for your warped vision; I will strengthen your heart, your free will to continue this fight until you see this vision fails; as this happens, you will, perhaps look for Me, you will at last see that I am truly in control of all areas of life--and death." 

This view of the "hardening" is a view of a daring, great love, and yet this is not tame, as CS Lewis used to say. This is a severe mercy and it certainly terrifies me, yet I stand back in awe of this Parent who would not settle for children who loved Him simply because they gave up in a one-upmanship competition, but because they really saw Him, finally. It also tells me that this is a God who will chase us down, stop at nothing; it also tells me that suffering and even death are, in the hands of God, educational, attempts to save us with our understanding, the necessary precursor to real consent, real love. 

The plagues are an intensifying lesson about who this "I am who am" is; from the moment that He introduces Himself to Moses as Existence itself, to the moment when He commands thousands of tons of water to fall upon the army of Pharaoh, God is showing who He is; He, in His mercy, creates a ladder of lessons, from almost playful courtroom displays to world-stage events. He allows a proud Pharaoh to face-off with Him, even as He allows a frightened, insecure Moses to take along a stronger voice in Aaron. He taught the Egyptians and the Israelites visceral lessons about His true nature as a Creator, the source of natural forces and their proper order; the One of Justice who will defend His people; the One who will never take free will or consent, simply because He wants to be served and loved, to be seen

We too live in a time of plague; we too live in the time of the Horsemen. Does it feel like we, God's people, are increasingly under the eye of Pharaoh, a multiplication of eyes intent of plutocratic dominance, anti-God, a mockery of the Creator who, though He could incinerate us all, nevertheless respects our free will, our ability to choose to live in a vision apart from Him? Are we living in Egypt, where fear of the forces of nature drive us to oscillation between dominance and worship of them? Is God hardening hearts again, squaring off for the fight for the true vision? 

One Jewish scholar stated that not all the Israelites chose to trust God and leave Egypt, that many of them stayed behind, new acolytes to the old pagan vision of placation and control. The remnant of Jacob's great family placed their trust in God and went through the water in defiance of worldly and demonic power: they made their choice to trust in the desert, on a journey that required that choice to trust--or not--over and over. Is there a remnant now? Which of us refuse to trust a system, a conglomeration of industry and government that seems lost in a warped vision, and instead wish to understand the truth, which is itself a movement toward Him who is the source of truth? 

Are we like those Israelites who must watch, and hope, and pray, and stand fast as the plagues come---does God harden hearts around us because He wants to educate not just some of us, but all of us? Is He showing us the natural consequences of a system built on faulty values and perverted practices like abortion?