
Ring the bells that still can ring,
forget the perfect offering,
there is a crack in everything
that's how the light gets in.
Leonard Cohen-Anthem-Nature
I just came back from Santa Barbara to Wyoming- like going from what Eden might have looked like to the mountains of the moon; winter is setting in here, that strange time of year when the skeletons hanging listlessly on doors in the wake of Halloween mirror the bony trees: trees slowly falling asleep in their wait for the gentle fingers of spring.
In a way, I am traveling that path also; now here in
Standing along the beach wall on Sunday, saying goodbye before taking to the road north, I remembered that when I was living here in Santa Barbara, I was full of passion- but a passion alternately unfettered and unreasonable and then clamped by terrible fears of consequence and punishment. Now, as I watched the waves pound in, I remembered also that this kind of passion led me to be a slave of Thanatos:
And there the children of dark Night have their dwellings, Sleep and Death, awful gods. The glowing Sun never looks upon them with his beams, neither as he goes up into heaven, nor as he comes down from heaven. And the former of them roams peacefully over the earth and the sea's broad back and is kindly to men; but the other has a heart of iron, and his spirit within him is pitiless as bronze: whomsoever of men he has once seized he holds fast: and he is hateful even to the deathless gods." (Hesiod, Theogony 758 ff, trans. Evelyn-White, Greek epic C8th or C7th B.C.)
Thanatos is the twin god of Sleep, twin children of Night and Darkness; and because I was a slave to my passion, I would, at times of destruction and fear, desire not to live, which is our modern understanding of Thanatos: a seizing, iron desire for final sleep. I loved deeply and passionately (I was not promiscuous, which by its nature cannot be passionate) as the Lord made me to do, but I did not know how to love with balance and without fear; thus, it was not a perfect love, for “perfect love casteth out fear”. I did not love the way the Lord would have us love, freedom within His will, His laws.
I left Santa Barbara once before, twelve years distant, completely dried out from tears; I could not cry anymore, so in the grip of Thanatos I was then: I do not know how I left, only that I was, in a way, slowly guided; a carrot here and there, and I was in graduate school in Annapolis; soon I was, girl-like, twirling on a wide campus lawn leading to the Severn River, alone in the gentle, falling snow at ten pm after a glorious class on Homer; I was in the Adoration Chapel at St. Mary’s at two am, laying on the floor and weeping again in the arms of the Lord, letting go my loss. I was slowly being released from the death-grip of that bronze demon.
I lived, then: drank deeply of Aristotle, Plato, Aquinas, Shakespeare, and Euclid (who would have thought math could be passionate?), taught, loved my students, married, had three children, came out of my shell because of the deep love and friendship of a few holy people, and began to create. I began to understand deeply Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116:
Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments. Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove:
O no! it is an ever-fixed mark
That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wandering bark,
Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
Within his bending sickle's compass come:
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.
I understood this in terms of God loving and not myself, for I had bent with removers, the deepest of failures- bent to have love removed from fear, mostly, a fear of not living up to what I was expected to do and suffering because I did not understand what was written deeply inside me; nor, at the time of my life in Santa Barbara, had I the saving balance, reason and teaching of the Faith- and my love and other's for me had been destroyed. How does one live with that knowledge, with that depth of failure in the deepest parts of life?
In the years that I began living again, I understood how God loves us: He looks upon tempests and is never shaken: and He began to teach me how to love that way, through suffering and discipline, through times of poverty on many levels; through His gift of Himself in the Eucharist and His gifts of children and family. I was in a school of love, and I know enough now after all that the love of Sonnet 116 is impossible for me to attain, to live- to the edge of doom?- and that it cannot come from any power in me.
When I returned to
So I stood at Butterfly Beach on the day I was to leave, watching the surfers and remembering that time I’d sat on the beach, twenty-one or so, and had asked God why I couldn’t sit and talk with Him, face to face; and the next minute, a man came up to me and said, “Can I sit with you and talk?” Not knowing who this guy was, and being ripped from my reverie, I said, “No”. Even though this may have been some pick-up, there was a lesson in it for me, I knew. This was me in a nutshell- asking God for everything in my deep way, like jumping into the blue and purple ocean not caring that I couldn’t swim, and then shrinking back in fear from any decision I was supposed to make, and then rolling around in regret and uncertainty afterward.
I stood there, now forty, and remembered that because of this agony of uncertainty, there was a deep current of thanatos in me, which is the mark of the truly depressed, and a mark of deep self-absorption. I began to weep for the destruction and disorder this had caused; I wanted to ask forgiveness from everyone I’d hurt and disturbed, especially those whose lives had been most deeply affected by me, and yet felt helpless to ever repair it all. Thanatos came and stood there by my side, but I recognized him and stared him in the face. Then from somewhere inside me (yet from somewhere outside of me as well) I heard, in that deep language which has none of the boulder-heavy quality of the words we speak, but rather the honey-ness of deep realities: “I want to LIVE”.
I got in my car and pulled away from the beach and up 101 towards
I do not know how to do this, but I do know that it must come from Christ. That is all. I know now that I want to burn up in a fireball- not in the way of Thanatos, but in the consuming fire of the love of Christ. I love the Sacred Heart, the Sacre Coeur, because He is described as an ocean of love, or a consuming fire, two images which are fundamental to my life. I understood finally the deep desire for martyrdom, the desire for the greatest love: “for no man has greater love than he who lays down his life for his friend”. I realized that the passionate person that I was made to be, better schooled now that I am, can desire no less than a fireball of love. So now I want to die, not in the arms of Thanatos, but in the fire of Christ, without fear. I want to supernaturalize my loves, and may destruction and regret and loss be burned away and love restored.
However, I cannot do this. My nature wants it now, wants not to wait, like a woman in love cannot wait for marriage, admitting no impediment; but this kind of love, I now know, the best kind of love, is dependent on the will of God. I understand St. Therese of Liseux better, perhaps: I think her greatest pain was not to be immediately consumed in this fire- she was, like me, made to be passionate at a deep level. Instead, she was consumed by tuberculosis- on a natural level- but God supernaturalized it, and with Him, St. Therese supernaturalized every action of her life, from picking apples to dying of suffocation slowly. This IS the heroism of the saint, and yet I am, as she describes, a weak bird in a storm who is looking for the sun. I am no longer afraid, except of sin and of my own weakness: or perhaps I should not be afraid of this weakness, for does not God work most through our weaknesses? Perhaps the one thing of which I am afraid is to live a passionless life, buried in the humdrum of bills and cycles. St. Therese, in her Little Way, I pray will teach me.
I ask now to be consumed in His fire, like a meteor across the sky, but I know it must be in His way and not out of a selfish desire. This will, I think,be the next school for me.

So now, Barry’s Bay, I am saying goodbye. In the last few weeks and days, I have been reminded both of our pilgrim status, the cross, and the “edge”.
When I first arrived, shocked and exhausted- and reluctant- I remember Fr. Terry, the biker-turned-Byzantine priest, telling me in his bear-like way, “Welcome to the edge”. It frightened me and thrilled me at the same time. The edge turned out to be a place from where I could see past the comforts and joys and temptations of this life. I have a memory in my mind of Fr. Terry pointing out the hill beyond our little dilapidated house, a lone, treed hill overlooking the rat-a-tat of pale little houses surrounded by yards beaten to death by weather, ski-doos, four-wheelers and toys. He pointed to that hill and told me it would be beautiful in the winter; and then he encouraged me that I would see beyond that, even, if I trusted God.
The edge turned out to be a place of well-placed little crosses for me to carry: financial panics, the grind of buying everything and only things on sale and otherwise cheap; battling anonymous arms for things at St. Joe’s thrift shop; a culture and community which seemed inscrutable to me for months; Canadian bureaucracy; losing a couple teeth; burned arms, root canals, sledding accidents and April still buried in the cold; and the ever-flapping housewrap-“Polish siding”. And finally, a very large cross: losing two precious students. This was a cross we all shared, and it seemed to break down barriers and open hearts all round.
Up until the point of the loss of Janine and Paul, the crosses were there to strip me of attachment to the comforts and beauties of this world. I’d imbued so much pressure to be and appear as the world would like without even knowing the extent of my attachments. Our Lady’s Valley, the area surrounding Barry’s Bay and Combermere, was a place where a mother’s hands gently but firmly stripped my soul. The cross of losing Janine and Paul was rather a cross for all of us in this community to carry together-it was too heavy to carry alone-but for me, it was a sort of completion of one part of my journey of attachment to this world, like a lodge halfway up a two-day hike: for both young people seemed to me to exemplify the idea of the Christian pilgrim, which necessarily carries within it the element of detachment. In their flight away from this world, culminated in their deaths, they hammered home the point to me that our home is not here.
With their deaths on the lake, another temptation to attachment was taken from me. When I first came here, all I wanted to do was to settle on
At first, it was St. Hedwig’s which seemed more and more beautiful; it was as if a light emanated from the place- the darker things got around me elsewhere, the lighter the church became. Then it was the faces of my students, my fellow teachers, the kindness of the lady at Afelskie’s and the flower lady at Value Mart, and my neighbor down the road on his funky new bike. They began to be luminous, just like my memories of my short time with Janine. I began to converse with Janine regularly, asking her for help in how I should see things- and truly she had already helped set the seeds for me for a better sight; for before she died, she had asked me, me already too burdened with tasks and roles and life in Barry’s Bay, if she could help with the Little Flowers group (which I had resisted starting). She broke that barrier, and I began to serve a little more, rather than looking at my own problems. My sight changed as the direction of my looking changed.
I know more now about the disorder of this place, as there are disorders in every place. But with my sight changed, I saw the miracle of God living side-by-side, almost with the filth on Him, as He works to change hearts and break down the barriers of disordered poverty, pride, selfishness and fear. I know, from my life in many different places (six or seven countries now), that this disorder is everywhere; but here it seems more naked in a way: in
After a year, after the Canadian winter and a winter of the soul, I am a pilgrim a little more, in a hurry on the road to God, less interested in delaying for the temptations along the way (as Divine Intimacy puts it). I am definitely less attached to my teeth and more concerned with the words of love which I can get past them and my attempts at the abeyance of selfish ones. I rejoice in the beauty of God’s house and the souls who crawl in on spiritual knees: I saw with real eyes the widow with the mite, and the little children who came close to Christ. I do not weep over the house I live in, but rather the loss of knowing, day-to-day, the beautiful souls I knew here.
However, I believe that all born-or re-born- in love does not die, nor fade. Both my look into the hearts of a few young students, who were making the miraculous effort(borne by grace) to turn to God, and my deepening knowledge of those farther along the way to holiness was a catalyst for greater love- and now, greater loss in a sense. But to lose sight of our brothers and sisters in this life means naught in the economy of the spirit. In fact, I think we can love purely if we simply keep praying for each other. This is the meaning of our life here: that is, to be pilgrims in love with God and those He loves; and the Cross in some way makes us pilgrims- for while we carry our crosses, we can’t carry anything else.
Image: www.pbase.com

The Church does not, in terms of holiness and spirituality, make a distinction between men and women. Both men and women are saints, both men and women Doctors of the Church- there are great woman theologians and, most importantly, the most precious saint in the Church is the Blessed Mother. Her role and her humility alongside the crown of glory given her by God, is the best example of a woman in the Church.
* Title of a book about which I can remember nothing else.
A pure heart is one who seeks God totally and fully; one who loves deeply and feels the pull of many things, yet still seeks, as in St. Louis de Montfort’s term, “God Alone”.
How many of us have seen or lived with a pure heart or have one ourselves? How can we ever really judge the purity of our own or another’s heart? Yes, impossible. God alone judges this; but we see and know glimpses of this purity in our lives, whether it is through the intimate experience of another or in our own moments of truly loving God. Through a very special experience of one of my students, I have learned that purity is a state of being won through habitual and courageous practice of virtue; and a death to oneself in order to live for Christ.
I met Janine when she came to my class the first day: well, actually, I didn’t notice her because there were so many students, and many more compelling or colorful, with great laughs and well-thought-out comments: she was rather a quiet presence just to my left, her long and thin fingers still on the paper, or quickly writing a note here or there. I began first to notice her smile, a little like a child’s (with a wrinkling of the nose). Her smile was genuine, from the eyes, and she would laugh or smile and give a look of some amazement, her small, black eyes widening (I never figured out what the amazement was, unless she was simply amazed at the things I got myself into in the way of joking).
Then she came to my office one night, to talk about a paper. I could tell she was very focused, with a cultivated sixth-sense for discipline. I was a little uncomfortable because notwithstanding the discipline, she seemed so very fragile and unsure of herself, and I wondered if she would make it through the rigor of the academics. She surprised me first with the quality of her work: her purpose was clear and her thoughts were succinct and genuine.
I asked her and another student to house-sit for us because I implicitly trusted her, and when we returned they surprised me with the tiniest, sweetest notes for my children, little encouraging statements for each of them; and further, she had ‘done a poustinia’ in our house: a time of fasting and prayer. I began to realize that she had a depth I’d not guessed at, and also that there was a goal in mind: not a mercenary goal, but a goal of love, and like St. Therese of Liseux, she did deeds of deep love in very small ways- so small that one might easily miss them altogether.
My next surprise came when she asked if my daughter would like to visit the elderly home with her and some other students. Every Sunday, the little group visiting the elderly grew, and Janine, I surmised, was not quite comfortable with either taking little children or speaking to older people who may or not be feeling well enough to be greeted. But she went anyway- and not in her soft-spoken, often unsure words, but rather in her actions, did I begin to ascertain a certain something which inspired me. What was it that lived in her, which belied the easily-ruffled waters on the surface of her being?
One night after class, we had a passionate discussion of the journey of the soul, as we studied it in the character of Odysseus, and how the Greeks were able to see certain truths even though they did not have Christ. To my shame, I can better remember my own words than hers; but I felt a sense of illumination and a joy in our meeting of the souls: for great literature can provide these meetings, when the souls are open to truth. Janine, my deep interlocutor during that short conversation, was passionate about the pure beauty of a human search for truth and discoveries of the heart.
A few nights later, I was trying to staple numerous pages together for a class, and I had all twenty-five or so page-piles laid out on the library tables- except for the front couple tables, where a dark coat and bag lay. Janine came in, and I apologized for the interruption of her studies. She tried to read for awhile with the noise of shuffling papers and my suppressed moans when the stapler began to malfunction. She noiselessly got up and asked if she could help me. I resisted for a second, and then something in her demeanor, something beyond sight or words made me understand that this was a gift to me and that I would do well to enjoy it. So we shuffled papers together and chatted peacefully. I always felt completely safe with Janine; she was a person with whom I was totally myself: ages, stations, backgrounds, none of these mattered: what mattered, it seemed to me, was the desire to love and be loved. I must admit that there are very, very few people with whom I feel completely myself.
The last time I saw Janine, she was a quiet observer within our small group chat after First Friday Mass and the louder ones of us were bantering about the cultural impact of the Rolling Stones and “Badger, Badger” You Tube videos. I didn’t even realize that Janine was there- it was dark and she was so quiet, and I am at times absorbed in my own wit- until the group broke up, and I saw her curled-lip smile. I smiled back in peace- and we waved goodbye. I was hoping that nothing we’d said had ruffled her delicacy, but I was glad to see her just hanging out; and I remember thinking that she was going past another boundary of what was perhaps not comfortable to her: bantering. As her face receded, still smiling, I turned away to make sure the kids were getting into the car. It was the last time I saw her.
The next day, Janine got a ride to spiritual direction, and there was a decision to go via the frozen lake. She and another student drowned when the van went through the ice.
In my grieving, the image of a delicate, pink rose keeps coming to my mind, wafting up from my soul, and from my memories of her. It is the kind of rose that waves a little in the breeze, at the end of a gentle and flexible stem, a rose of surpassing softness and transparency, a rose with a scent which requires all other scents to be purged before one can really experience it.
Janine, God’s pink rose, may have had imperfections I did not know about, but she gave me a powerful example of purity, and the very real struggle for it. She was focused on God, it seemed to me: all her actions, all her service and her joys seemed bent by an indomitable will towards Him. This clarity of purpose and desire required her to be courageous: she had to go past what was comfortable, and she wanted to because of Love. She had to say no to attachments and desires, fears and natural dislikes, in order to say “yes” to God. She did it, with some trembling sometimes, but she did it nonetheless. I learned from her that purity for God requires courage.
She was such a paradox of rose and iron: but this paradox melts away when seen in the light of pursuing Love Himself- for “love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.” You see, I think that this Love is so gentle, but to do all these things, to be truly gentle in the winds of this world requires a purity of heart, a heart for God alone; and this, in turn, requires a strong will to say, over and over, “I want to do what You want. I want to believe in You. I want to hear only Your voice.” In those choices of the will, there must be God-given courage; and what results is Christ in the world again: even if He is taken again in some way, as He was, I think, when Janine died in the days just before Lent.
I will LIVE, I will LOVE, I will ask for courage to have a pure heart- and I will hope to continue to know Janine through the bridge of prayer.

image: shiftingpixel.comI think that the “Cross of Combermere” has something to do with detachment. It seems that this area was picked from the ice age as a place for the cross and thus a chance, a chance for detachment; for as soon as the glaciers scratched their way south, taking almost all the good topsoil with them, and leaving rocky hillsides and blue-eyed lakes, it became a potential place for poverty.
And so it was; when the white men came, these lands were the leavings. Polish and Irish suffered here and became tough in their strange lives of the beautiful and the miserable: and then Catherine and Eddie Doherty came, two people accustomed to wealth, who were now establishing a spiritual center for the ministry to the poor. Then their vision seemed to develop into a deep understanding of Christ and His choice to be poor with the poor. Catherine’s old Russian memories of the poustinikki, men and women who gave all they had to retreat into silence and poverty, began to develop in her soul and she understood that her early visions of helping the poor were just the beginnings. As she established her dreams of silence and union with God, she understood that it must be in the context of poverty: the poustinia of Madonna House, in my mind, are little gateways, chances for the individual to have a taste of the spiritual road to God: a road, where, “The Son of Man has no place to lay His Head”. Walking with the Man of Sorrows is must be on a lowly dirt road, a road empty in the night where one must look for a place to lay for the night, stomach rumbling, feet sore: but heart full.
And so I, with my half-heart: half materialist, half spiritual longing; I, with my torn heart, have played on the outskirts of the true life. I am driving on that dirt road, wondering if I can indeed park my comforts, get out, and walk with Christ. I have not felt strong enough, or worthy. And how I love nice things, love beauty; my eyes have not been blinded enough to the world to see the beauty of God. Here, under the Combermere Cross, I have been mostly afraid and angry. I don’t want to have to be afraid of every bill; I don’t want to have to go to shop at the thrift store. I remember shopping in
However, something inside wants union with God: this has never really changed; and I understand now that it is because He wants this- of all of us. Love desires union. So I have, all my life, done things with half of myself, dragging the other half (which is screaming and threatening dire consequences) in search of the beauty which is beyond sight, of the love which is beyond the capacity of my heart. I believe, too, that this is the condition and desire of every human heart, and remains so. I don’t believe this desire can ever be fully expelled or ignored, but living a torn life causes disorder and unhappiness. A choice must be made.
I look now more closely at what the half which longs for God is doing; and it is easier to look at it here, under the Combermere Cross. No matter where I go, whether we are called to stay here in Barry’s Bay or not, God called us here to be under this cross, and to understand poverty by living in the beginnings of it. Relative to what I have seen around the world, we are rich. But relative to what we are used to, and God knows this, we are poor. We are wimps and God knows it and is merciful to our pathetic crying: but merciful enough, also, to keep moving us closer to the ideal.
I see St. Francis in my mind; the missionaries and saints, and Mother Teresa: and I see a depth of freedom in their lives and actions that is beyond what any king or dictator enjoys. Yet it seems that I am still watching them work out their salvation in Christ- from the car. When Father Terry told me in the beginning of my pilgrimage here, “Welcome to the Edge”- I felt that I was finally getting out of the car- but then I get back in; ride, back out; walk a few steps and get scared.
I finally understood one night, after tears of deep frustration, that it was about detachment. So I went to the church to pray- it was locked, Our Lord inside. I sat in the car, literally, but my heart was outside waiting for the Lord on the road. As I looked at the lonely cross outside the church, I asked Him to begin to teach me about true detachment; and I begin to understand that a person can be as owner-minded and thus prideful about being poor for the sake of the kingdom as he is about having human power and riches. “What a minefield along this road to God”, I thought; “-if I am going to be prideful, I might as well be rich and at least provide well for my children (and myself)!”
Pride is the deep enemy within ourselves against union with God. “He resists the proud”- and how often I have felt this resistance. Poverty, then, is essentially a thing in the soul- and it cannot be an end in itself, or it simply becomes another petty idol, a place of pride, worse than that of the rich because it is under the veneer of spiritual advancement. Poverty is about detachment, of treating nothing as if I own it- because if I own it, I begin to love it; it is a physical extension of myself (Divine Intimacy). I must be detached from things, and this journey along the dirt road of poverty must be essentially a journey where one puts more and more down along the side and continues with less and less (but with more and more room for Christ).
Detachment itself cannot be the end, because then we would be Buddists only, and God wishes more than nothing-ness for us, He wishes to give us Himself. Detachment is the condition under which God can come to us, when we are becoming places where the proportion of our self to His Self matches reality, matches heaven. When we are full of Him, we are most ourselves because we give glory to Him who needs none, but is Glory Itself: and thus, as
The crosses of life, whether they are Combermere Crosses, Santa Cruz Crosses, New York Crosses, or African Crosses, are gateways. They are chances by which we may begin to detach from the beauties and comforts of this life, in order to see God and thus to bring real beauty into the world, a beauty which glories in God and shows others His love: from simple flower gardens to solid family life, to a love of philosophy and literature; like the songs of St. Francis or a beautiful painting done by a happy child, or the halo of light that the journalist Malcolm Muggeridge saw when he visited Mother Teresa’s House of the Dying (Something Beautiful for God).
Image from the Madonna House website
I have been here in Ontario two months, arriving timidly in the humid and stark days of August and now facing the sultry and mecurial weather of October. I am waiting for the cold, like a soldier in the trench looking for the first sign of movement out across no-man’s land.
Life goes slow here, with small “Combermere Crosses” laid on from time to time (Combermere is an adjoining town wherein lies the Madonna House). It is a place I want to run from one day and to embrace the next: just like the Cross. The town of
This area, about twenty or so miles square, seems like a spiritual powerhouse: it would look like
Catherine Doherty came here because it was most like her native
For me, I feel like a soft-bellied rookie here- these people are tough. They roll their eyes at me when I tell them where I am from(where am I from?). The Catholic immigrants, of the last sixty years, drawn like bees to the Madonna House spirit, are not tough Poles for the most part. But they are serious counter-culture and fighters- from a young mother in her bohemian-blue, solid cabin-farmhouse to a man-pillar in his ever-present joy. For me, this place with its wind-blown, misted lakes and deep forests is a visible reminder of the spiritual life on this earth, this place of exile- it is as if the spiritual realities of beauty and simplicity, suffering and exile are here more visible than anywhere else I have ever been.
I came here afraid of the winter, and the Lord is making me face a deeper fear: that of being a saint. Part of me does not want to get tougher on myself; yet I sense the real and lasting joys, also visible to me in the chance to teach and help something worthy grow- namely, the Academy. I am like a flimsy and flapping tent in the wind, comparing myself to the large, bulky stone houses that stare back at the lake and the wind and defy it in the Lord’s strength. When I begin to see the reality of the saints, their inner strength and deep love of God, mirrored in the landscape and the lives of simpler people here, I realize what a city ninny I really am, what a spiritual weakling, what a fearful soul.
Perhaps if I make it through the winter, the spiritual one, I will be a saint. One can always hope, but not in my strength- I’ve
I remember about ten years ago, when I lived in

I was that prophet-mute; that prince stripped of power and honor
Who first beheld You in that wilderness of my shame:
Being hid within flame
Like all who suddenly behold God, I fell in fear, I decried
My own sins and was given a way to approach: in the softness, the vulnerability
Of my shepherd’s feet.
You asked me to speak for enslaved
Like a feral, wounded animal hobbled by healing bands
Approached by the Healer
You caressed me with reproach, stroking my fear down
To a steadied flatness and with a promise: new understanding
Of Your Person.
I was that sunburnt piece of humanity on the side of the Mountain
Who climbed beyond knowledge as You led me:
Inward and outward ascent
An ember twirling in fire-wind, begging to see Your face, to know
you as a man knows his friend and silence fell: softness of thought:
“You will die-”
I was in the cleft; I was the Eagle’s chick with Your wing over me
Nearly burnt to death in the wake of your back
Shekinah gave way to form
In my heart, the longing to see Your Face remained, to be
drawn in to unity and made a new being: I to Thou
Ever afterwards.
I was then, with Elijah, Your I to Thou, I was a Face Fulfilled
By the Suffering God;
I’d never have guessed Your design, especially
after
As I took my eternal fill of Your Countenance and of God’s light unabashed,
Made bold with love and immanent freedom, I spoke as a man to his friend,
Of the glorious Cross.
